Terrorists and the US Constitution

Terrorists and the US Constitution

Postby Stu on Sat Jun 21, 2008 3:39 pm

Perhaps congressional Democrats and the five SCOTUS justices are correct.

Perhaps terrorists should indeed be arrested, granted Constitutional protections when they fall under US control, and afforded access to our criminal justice system.

Perhaps we need to rethink the whole War on Terror thing and simply adopt a kinder and gentler approach that hemorrhages time and money while allowing peer juries to account for the negative political, economic, societal, cultural, and environmental influences affecting terrorists charged with crimes. You know, "innocent until proven guilty" and all that.

Perhaps we should adopt a process that allows us to feel and look good when we "brand” convicted felons - figuratively, of course - and reinforce mechanisms preventing them from entering our country to cause mayhem (except to receive organ transplants in California).

The Left can even point to a recent "success story".

Last week, England interdicted a convicted felon who wanted to enter the country. The felon was identified using an internationally shared criminal database and notified prior to arrival that entry would be denied. Publicly outed, the felon promised good behavior but to no avail as the visa request was denied. Word on the street is that authorities confirm privately that prompt action in this case likely prevented a hostile makeover, or worse.

The felon? Martha Stewart.

Or perhaps we can continue to hunt down and kill terrorists, disrupt their financial and organizational networks, and imprison those we capture in obscure places like GITMO until they either die or are Left Behind, whichever comes first.

Seriously. A radical immigrant invasion is eating Europe's lunch and the British make a big deal about Martha Stewart. America won't be far behind unless we halt the dangerously naive behavior afflicting some in our executive, legislative, and judicial branches vis-a-vis the War on Terror.

Perhaps this thread can serve as an educational forum on how best to do that. Care to opine?


Stu McLennan
Harker Heights
Stu
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:22 am
Location: Fort Hood

Re: Course correction needed

Postby Stu on Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:50 am

14 Nov 2009

President Obama needs to get “left of the boom” or risk losing the War on Terror (aka his directed euphemism Overseas Contingency Operations).

Soldiers know it’s not good enough to try and detect/neutralize IEDs once they’re emplaced. We can’t find them all. Getting “left of the boom” best sets conditions for success by shifting the focus to predicting the threat and interdicting enemy command, control and resource networks.

The following behaviors are preventing us from dealing effectively with jihadists and should therefore be purged from those who lead this country.

o Making domestic agendas a higher priority than victory in war.
o Being reactive instead of proactive.
o Refusing to confront Muslims who embrace radical Islam.
o Dismantling our national security apparatus.
o Embracing the political correctness that facilitates the infiltration of militants into our society and the military it reflects.
o Adhering to the mindset that terrorists – whether US citizens or not - are criminals and deserve access to our civilian judicial system.
o Granting terrorists protections under the US Constitution and Geneva Conventions.
o Avoiding the word “treason” and the use of military tribunals.
o Establishing Rules of Engagement that focus on eliminating collateral damage.
o Fearing the media.

America and its leaders have the capacity yet lack the collective will. Bad things will likely continue to happen until that changes.

Still Serving, Army Strong!

Stu McLennan
Harker Heights
Stu
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:22 am
Location: Fort Hood


Return to International Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron